top of page

A Tale of Two Consent Calendars

Updated: Sep 8


ree

This chart I've made compares the Consent Calendar (CC) with the newly passed Consent Agenda Resolution from October. I hope it clarifies the debate.

According to Ordinance 214

According to the October 22 Resolution

On record since January 28,1993

Proposed since October 8, 2024

Mayor builds the CC

Mayor builds the CC

All items should be routine and/or non-controversial

All items should be routine and/or non-controversial

Item removal by any member upon request.

Item removal requires majority of council vote

Remaining items pass by unanimous consent

Can be passed with a majority vote.

Conforms to standard practice of a CC

Does not conform to any standard practice that I’m aware of.

Intended to shorten meeting time

Would likely lengthen meeting times

No debate allowed on CC items, therefore contested items are removed.

Debate is necessary on CC items if contested.

All Council Members should agree

Allowance of disunity

Members are equal

Members are unequal

Ordinance 214 and the new resolution are conflicting, so the current procedure involves voting to repeal Ordinance 214 at the upcoming City Council Meeting on December 10. If this occurs, it could potentially impede any Council member who wishes to remove an item from the Consent Agenda for any reason in the future. In previous meetings, I've called this new process a rubber stamp calendar because once an item is on the consent calendar, removing it requires a majority vote, which almost ensures its approval.


Thank you for taking the time to read this and be involved.

Sandy White

Updated

 
 
 

Comments


Sandy White

Disclaimer:

This is a personal blog and website. Any views or opinions represented are personal and belong solely to the blog owner and do not represent those of people, institutions, or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in a professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated.

bottom of page